The rest of Leviticus
is just more regulations. The laws that ensue flesh out the ten commandments.
It confirms the Decalogue as fundamental moral law: a constitutional framework.
The ensuing regulations
reference the Decalogue directly or indirectly. All laws in constitutional
states complement constitutional principle else they will be challenged.
Constitutionalism only
emerged when the Magna Carta was signed in 1215. Even so, that great document
was spurned by King John. Only three clauses remain in British law.
Later, William Penn,
introduced a constitution in Pennsylvania, as a precursor to the US Constitution,
after the Articles of Confederation failed to unite the thirteen states.
France introduced a
constitution after the tennis court debacle of Louis XVI led to the revolution
that ended the monarchy. Britain then deposed Charles 1 in favor of Cromwell’s
democracy.
I am not saying the Decalogue
favored democracy, but it laid the ground rules for all other laws, which were
as adaptive as contemporary laws, thanks to the oral tradition, whilst
subscribing to the fundamental framework - as all good constitutional states
should.
The Jewish legal
system was millennia ahead of its time and the first time in history that a law
was set above all, be they kings, statesmen or soldiers.
The ensuing
regulations were not austere, pointless legalisms, but the heart of a progressive
God who wanted a just and equitable society.
No private sacrifices (Chapter 17)
I live in a country where
people slaughter animals in their back yards. Not only is that unfair and
patently barbaric, it is self-defeating. If a sacrifice is not properly
validated, then it is a kind of self-validation, which is not a sacrifice at
all.
God rejected that, as
He had made adequate provision for a central facility where sacrifices could happen
in an orderly, humane manner with the blessing of qualified priests.
Though God sacrificed
His son for humanity and provided a costly path to redemption, humans still snub
that in favor of their own private solutions, then presume that such man-made
ways are good enough. That fails the first test: it is not validated by God.
Please forgive a crude
point. At work they spoke of “intellectual masturbation”, where people agonize
over their private ideas and theories to make themselves feel better while
doing little or no communal good. That is what private ways are to God.
If any religion is
about pleasing God and knowing His favor, then surely it must answer the most
fundamental question about what that God wants, and if it doesn’t, by
implication it is self-serving and not a religion or a worthy sacrifice at all.
God extended the law
to the eating of blood, which is still marginal to social norms and health
regulations. He also forbade sacrifices to idols, other gods or devils. That
too was right as the cultural norms of Israel demanded one right way, not
everyone for himself.
Uncovering of nakedness (Chapter 18)
Being undressed or
scantily dressed, is a hallmark of contemporary society. It reflects a wanton,
sensual, self-serving society that has chosen to test moral boundaries and
tempt God. It has indirectly led to a breakdown of the social fabric.
God would not have
that. There was a history to that. Reuben, Uncovering of anyone else’s nakedness was strictly regulated. Yes in
marriage, no in almost any other context. That includes violations of parents,
daughters-in-law, neighbors and even one’s own wife. It was a morally decent
society.
I do not see anything
unreasonable in the regulations. That is a long-held prejudgment of God’s laws.
He was not a killjoy. He just wanted a safe, ordered society as a basis for
wholeness, happiness and continuity. Society snubbed His ways for all the wrong
reasons.
Honoring father, mother, the Sabbath and your
people (Chapter 19)
God then reasserted
the first 4 commandments, to honor God, the Sabbath and our parents. The average
Jewish child loves the weekly Sabbath meal. It centers them. It is a powerful touchstone.
As for family, well that is sacred to the Jew.
That is why they are the most enduring society in history. We have none of that, nor does the church. We break
bread every now and then and have scant regard for the long-weekend we call Easter, duly named after Ishtar: the great witch Semiramis who presumed to be the mother of God.
I accept a Sunday Sabbath, as the early church met on the first day of the week, because the crux of the church
was a resurrection. The crux of Jewry was a death or sacrifice.
I am not an advocate
of reverting to Jewish ways as it assumes a formulaic approach to favor
with God. Not so. Favor came through what Jesus did. However, the principle of
Sabbath predates Moses. It was enshrined in divine principle from the day of
creation.
We so badly need to
bring our families together once a week, in honor of each other (God put family
and Sabbath in the same sentence) and to sustain the touchstone of our faith,
our values, our ethos and our lives. We need to be a true counter-culture to a
dying world.
God extended that to
sundry laws about interrelationships with others, leaving some of your crops
for the poor, not prostituting daughters, divination, honoring of strangers and
so on.
What a lovely law. No wonder it is also called a covenant, as like any social contract, as was also true of William Penn's constitution, it requires our allegiance to work. It is for us, after all, and if we are grown up and civilized we should embrace it by choice, not by duress.
I see so much good and all we ever remember is what we perceive as onerous and demanding prescriptions relating to religious rituals. That is how the world also perceives the church: not as wholesome, peace-loving citizens, but as religious nuts.
I see so much good and all we ever remember is what we perceive as onerous and demanding prescriptions relating to religious rituals. That is how the world also perceives the church: not as wholesome, peace-loving citizens, but as religious nuts.
God help us as a
society, as the church and as humanity, to reclaim virtue and principle before
our world reaches a point of no return. We are not free for all our supposed
moral freedoms, we are enslaved to our immorality and have lost our compass.
(c) Peter Missing @ bethelstone.com