This is a Christian inspirational site. Bethelstone suggests a touchstone where believers can find inspiration. The daily bible in a year studies will be short and meditative: a bit heavier for foundation principles, a bit lighter for factual content.

Day 52: Numbers 26 to 30 - Further signs of maturity


The people of Israel started to show all the signs of acquired maturity. Not only was their a transition of leadership but also of discretion and self-determination, with relevant reforms.


A fresh census (Chapter 26)

You may not have realized it yet, but the records were silent on the 40 years that Israel spent in the Wilderness. It was all a mundane trudge.

The story is taken up again toward the end of the end of that period as they started moving towards the Promised Land. Thus a changing of the guard was seen, with Eleazar replacing Aaron, Miriam departing and Joshua made heir-apparent to Moses.

Thus the second census, of all males over 20, occurred after the 40 years.

Yet, the numbers were similar, namely 601,730, slightly down from 603,550. It confirms that despite a good birth rate, they had remained constant.

That is attributable to a number of dying offs due to plagues, judgments and wars. However, natural death rates may well have climbed in the harsh desert conditions.

God clearly said that the 40 years would see off an entire generation, which means that the average mortality age declined to 60 (compare that to the 120 span of Moses).

Eleazar ran the census. Not one of those originally numbered by Moses and Aaron, had survived, barring Joshua and Caleb.

A legal ruling (Chapter 27)

The daughters of Zelophehad had been disinherited by his death as there was no male issue to continue his line. The result was a bit like the sea-change in universal suffrage that happened when women gained the right to vote.

Women were allowed to inherit where there was no male issue. This is one of many examples where constitutional issues were decided by Moses and later by the Sanhedrin. It marked the beginning of the oral tradition of the Pharisees.

By that I mean that the nuances of law started to be relevantly interpreted, beyond the limitation of literal law as was demanded by the Sadducees.

This is in stark contrast to the narrow, intolerant culture of Muslims. Puritans and other legalistic cultures, which reveal their theological immaturity and limited discernment, by reflecting their insecurities through harsh religious codes.

It is, however, interesting that Jesus rejected both poles, the former because they applied oral discretion too expediently and the latter because they were bereft of discernment and wisdom. God is always in the balance. He was forging a culture not a religion.

The appointment of Joshua, son of Nun

Throughout the unfolding of the Exodus years, Joshua kept popping up. He had always distinguished himself. Thus the mantle of leadership inevitably transferred to him.

In so doing, some of Moses’ honor passed to the younger man. He was singled out because the spirit of leadership was already on him.

It recalls how Jesus said, “The spirit of the Lord is on me, because He anointed me”. There are always two stages: a calling followed years later by a commissioning.

The latter is fulfilled through the laying on of hands, which is more than just an act: it is one of the fundamental principles of divine doctrine (Hebrews 6).

A revision of the sacrifices and liturgical calendar (chapter 28-29)

I am not going to cover this ground again. It may have some new information, but not enough to warrant a new discussion on the matter.

The making of vows by women (chapter 30)

The rights to enter into contractual agreements was naturally extended to women, which confirms a  maturing in the national mindset.

They had shifted from a harsh, puritan culture, to a wiser, more balanced worldview. They were growing up, so God conceded a degree of discretion and freedom.

Women were still under covering and so if a father or husband did not support her vow or contractual arrangement, it was null and void, not unlike the laws applying to marriage today.

However, women were gaining rights. They were never marginalized the way that say, Muslim or Hindu women are. They were treated with dignity, a fact that inspired Ruth to leave her misogynistic and otherwise base culture for the dignified culture of the Jews.

Conclusion

Israel was clearly coming of age. The next phase would see them take a long overdue stand against the bullies that had troubled them along the way. They were ready to assert their maturity and stand tall in the purpose of God.  

(c) Peter Missing @ bethelstone.com